They care about the value extracted from us in aggregate. Nobody at the top cares if you or me are having a nice experience with the site/app. Even worse than that - they're stochastic cattle. For Reddit (as well as Meta and other social media platforms), the users are cattle. Why do people assume Reddit C-suite and investors are being stupid or narcissistic here? That would make sense if the relationship between them and the users was a friendly one. They'll then discuss all the advancement in cattle fencing and barn construction that happened in the 30 years since. What they'll be talking about is how Reddit had too many holes in its fence, and all its cows escaped. Is a person singular, is a person continuous, or are these things more messy than that?" Screen Rant also had an interview with Cronenberg, which can be viewed below.> Then, 30 years from now, people will still talk about how Reddit self-destructed when they decided they needed to control the user experience and forced everyone to use their app. He also spoke about Infinity Pool's themes of identity, saying "it’s more about what makes someone a continuous human. Cronenberg admits that he was inspired by a bizarre vacation to the Dominican Republic in which he was bused into a resort that was surrounded by a razor-wire fence in the dead of night. However, Cronenberg also had an interview with Fangoria discussing Infinity Pool, and he did give some insight into his casting choices, the story, and its themes. Therefore, he refuses to forecast his own opinions on the Infinity Pool ending, saying, "I do know what the ending means to me, but it’s not something I want to reveal because I want people to have a chance to explore on their own terms." In an interview with One Take News, Cronenberg was asked about the Infinity Pool ending, and stated that while he does have his own interpretation, he believes that a big part of a piece of art's creation is audience interaction and interpretation. Infinity Pool explained little of its ending, and director Brandon Cronenberg has also decided to keep its meaning under wraps.
#Netflix aftermath sucks reddit movie#
The Infinity Pool movie explained what happens if one is given both affluence and a consequence-free existence, to which the answer turned out to be a loss of humanity.
#Netflix aftermath sucks reddit free#
It's because of their money that they are able to live free of consequences. It speaks to an ugliness of increased wealth as it states that if one already has the ability to have it all, then human desires become more extreme. It's important to note that the only reason these murder tourists are able to keep up their games is that they have the cash to produce more clones. Themes of hedonism and affluence collide in the Infinity Pool ending.
However, the dehumanizing of James doesn't stick, and the Infinity Pool ending sees a man being a literal shell of his former self, whether the original or a clone. Things only change between Gabi and James when he's forced to kill his double himself, and she quickly begins to dehumanize and emasculate him for his lack of bloodlust. Infinity Pool explained that Gabi entices James first through sexual pleasure and then with moral freedom.
James' wife, Em, is the moralizing Super-Ego, and her departure makes James thoroughly corrupted by Gabi. Using psychoanalytic theory, Gabi represents the instinctual desires of the Id, and James is the organized and realistic Ego.
0 kommentar(er)
